AccuWeather Forensics was retained by a property management company in a slip-and-fall case involving allegations of hazardous snow and ice conditions. A detailed forensic weather analysis examined multiple snowstorms, rainfall, temperatures, snowmelt, and ground conditions leading up to and at the time of the incident. The analysis concluded that nearly all naturally accumulated snow had melted by the morning of the incident, remaining snow was wet and slushy, and the conditions were not icy. The client later informed AccuWeather that the case was dismissed based on the findings of AccuWeather Forensics and other experts.

Key Takeaways

AccuWeather Forensics analyzed weather and ground conditions associated with a slip-and-fall claim.

-- The analysis reviewed multiple snowstorms and periods of rain and snowfall leading up to the incident.

-- Above-freezing temperatures and rain-on-snow contributed to significant snowmelt before the incident.

-- By the morning of the incident, nearly all remaining naturally accumulated snow had melted.

-- The forensic analysis concluded that ground conditions were wet, remaining snow was wet and slushy, and conditions were not icy.

-- The client informed AccuWeather that the case was dismissed based on findings from AccuWeather Forensics and other experts.

<<When Weather Is A Factor In Your Case, AccuWeather Can Help You Win. Request your free consultation today>>

What Was the Slip-and-Fall Case?

AccuWeather Forensics was retained by a property management company after a woman slipped and fell at a property managed and operated by the defendants. The plaintiff alleged that the defendants failed to properly maintain the property and that unnatural ice and snow conditions contributed to her fall. Determining the actual weather and surface conditions at the property became an important part of evaluating the circumstances surrounding the incident.

How Did Forensic Weather Analysis Establish the Conditions?

AccuWeather Forensics reviewed weather conditions leading up to and at the time of the incident. Multiple snowstorms had affected the location, producing periods of rain and snowfall. The day before the incident, warmer temperatures combined with rain falling on existing snow caused much of the older snowpack to melt. Temperatures remained above freezing during the night, allowing additional melting to occur. By the following morning, nearly all naturally accumulated snow had melted, the ground was wet, and any remaining snow was wet and slushy. Based on the meteorological evidence, AccuWeather Forensics concluded that the conditions were not icy.

What Was the Outcome of the Case?

The property management company later informed AccuWeather that the case was dismissed in court based on the findings provided by AccuWeather Forensics and other experts. The case demonstrates how forensic weather analysis can help attorneys, insurers, property managers, and other organizations reconstruct past weather and surface conditions using meteorological evidence. In slip-and-fall litigation involving alleged snow or ice hazards, a detailed analysis of temperature, precipitation, snowpack, melting, and ground conditions can provide important evidence for understanding what conditions were present at the time of an incident.

Why attorneys and insurers use AccuWeather Forensics

AccuWeather Forensic Meteorologists provide objective weather reconstruction and analysis that clarify environmental conditions surrounding disputed events. Using the greatest collection of weather-related data available, including publicly available and proprietary data sets, our experts analyze historical weather records, local observation data, snow and ice conditions, precipitation history and temperature trends to support insurance disputes, accident investigations, property damage cases and other litigation.

NASA marks Hubble’s 200,000th orbit around Earth with a stunning image