Share |

"Climategate" was meant to "intimidate" scientists, says Mann

Jan 16, 2012; 4:32 PM ET

Dr. Michael Mann in the news once again with some strong comments to a British newspaper........

Dr. Michael Mann, who is the Director of the Penn State Earth System Science Center and most well known for his "hockey stick" rendition of long-term climate change was recently interviewed by The Independent (UK).

"Climategate" was meant to "intimidate" scientists, says Mann (via The Telegraph.)

Here are some key excerpts from The Independent's interview.......

"I've been the focus for attack by those who deny the reality of climate change for so long that it almost seems like forever," the professor of meteorology at Pennsylvania State University says. "I'm a reluctant public figure, but I have embraced the opportunity to communicate the science."

Mann believes the theft of the emails was not the work of a random hacker, but part of a sophisticated campaign. "It was a very successful, well-planned smear campaign intended ... to go directly at the trust the public had in scientists," he insists. "Even though they haven't solved the crime of who actually broke in, the entire apparatus for propelling this manufactured scandal on to the world stage was completely funded by the fossil-fuel front groups."

Climate contrarians argued that Mann and his colleagues were concealing their research methods because they had something to hide. In reply, Mann insists that he has been as open as he can about data and methodology, but the aim of these requests has more to do with intimidation than openness. "What they are trying to do is to blur the distinction between private correspondence and scientific data and methods, which of course should be out there for other scientists to attempt to reproduce.

"When we first published our Nature article (with the Hockey stick temperature graph) in 1998, we went back six centuries," Mann says. "A year later we published a follow-up going back 1,000 years with quite a few caveats. In fact, the caveats and uncertainties appeared in the title, and the abstract emphasised just how tentative this study was because of all the complicating issues.

"It's frustrating that to some extent all of that context had been lost and the result has been caricatured. Often the errors bars are stripped away, making it appear more definitive than it was ever intended."

What are your thoughts about Michael Mann's comments?

Comments

Comments left here should adhere to the AccuWeather.com Community Guidelines. Profanity, personal attacks, and spam will not be tolerated.

More

  • Politics and Public Opinion on Climate Change

    Feb 6, 2012; 3:24 PM ET

    A new study that was published in the journal Climatic Change concludes that the main driving factor (no surprise) that influences public opinion on climate change is the political mobilizing efforts......

  • Mystery Tree Decline may be finally Solved

    Feb 3, 2012; 12:18 PM ET

    The Yellow Cedar, which is a valuable, slow-growing and long-living tree that grows from southeastern Alaska through parts of British Columbia has been mysteriously declining

  • Globally, 2011 will go down as Warm and Wet

    Jan 30, 2012; 3:49 PM ET

    Despite the cooling influence of La Nina during the early and late part of last year, 2011 will still go down as the 11th warmest year on record globally

About This Blog


AccuWeather.com Bloggers

2/23/2012 11:12:30 AM /blog-entry.asp 6 .75.109 (accuweather)-- [new]