Many studies conclude that global warming is increasing drought worldwide, however; new research indicates that a widely used model known as the Palmer Drought Severity Index has been overestimating changes in regional, and now global drought, according to ScienceNews..
The problem has to do with the way of calculating a quantity called potential evaporation, the amount of evaporation that would occur given an unlimited water supply. Historically, scientists calculated potential evaporation using the Thornthwaite equation, which is based entirely on temperature. The more complete Penman-Monteith equation, by contrast, incorporates the influences of solar radiation, humidity and wind speed. The latter gives a much more accurate measure of potential evaporation, says study coauthor Justin Sheffield, a hydroclimatologist at Princeton University. (via ScienceNews)
The research team proceeded to calculate global drought trends from 1950 to 2008 using both equations on multiple datasets. Notably, they found a much smaller change in drought using the Penman-Monteith equation. The estimated yearly drought increase was only half as severe as that derived from the Thornthwaite equation.
Another unrelated recent study by Aiguo Dai, an atmospheric scientist at the State University of New York at Albany puts into question this particular conclusion by Sheffield and his team, indicating that the study fails to consider trends in soil moisture and other variables. He also claims that the new study relies on outdated weather records and questionable radiation data. However, Sheffield and colleagues attribute the disagreement to inconsistencies in the weather data used by Dai and others. (via ScienceNews)
One thing that most scientists agree on is that the Palmer Index will become less and less accurate over time.
A particular climate geoengineering effort to reduce the amount of sunlight might not work out.....
Understanding the climate model.
A look at the model projected long-term changes in global temperatures and precipitation based on a combination of four greenhouse gas emission scenarios.
Going back 10,000 years, researchers have determined that the Greenland Ice Sheet was actually at its smallest size between three and five thousand years ago.
Observed changes in global precipitation are directly affected by human activities and cannot be explained by natural variability alone.
Better late than never. Here is the global October 2013 satellite measured temperature anomaly data